Re: Euphoria vs. C and OOP
I agree with you Bill, Euphoria should stay euphoria, not becoming,
c++,java or whatever of the same.
Your exemple is a good one, but the use of strings for commands would
slow down the execution a bit. Global constants could be defined instead for
commands.
Improvement to euphoria should stick to simple guidelines:
- minimize typing effort
- reduce name conflict (improvement to namespaces)
- reduce scope of variables (related to namespaces)
My yesterday suggestions stick to those guidelines and I agree with Jason
concerning an enum decleration because it would reduce typing in accessing
sequence elements by defining constants.
regards,
Jacques DeschĂȘnes
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|