Re: Euphoria Object Oriented Programming
Why does Euphoria need OO features? Mike Nelson already offers robust OOP
solutions in library form.
There are hundreds of languages that offer OO. Why does Euphoria need to become
yet another? Adding OO to the language definition certainly won't simplify
anything.
Perhaps this is the point where Euphoria splits into two entities? One in which
is supportive of OOP concepts and another that retains it's founding principles
of simplicity and performance?
I'm not really complaining though. I found something far better than any general
purpose language could offer me. A platform that doesn't involve coding or
programming languages, only simple mouse clicks and keystrokes.
Regards,
Vincent
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
