Re: Euphoria Object Oriented Programming
Matt Lewis wrote:
>
> No kidding. ooeu compiles to about 200K larger than stock exw under
> Open Watcom. That's the difference between including win32lib or not
> including win32lib on a bound executable (when no win32lib routines
> are used). To me, personally, this is negligible.
>
I was talking about binding programs not using the 'C' compiler.
>
> You completely lost me here. How is this not practical? What extra
> overhead are you talking about here? There is no extra overhead in the
> euphoria code, just in the interpreter or the runtime library.
>
When you run shroud for 2.4 it stripped out all the unused functions
and constants.
>
> And why are you so concerned about executable size? I find it hard to
> believe that 200K would make a big difference unless you're targeting
> something embedded, but then maybe eu isn't the right language for that
> platform.
>
Not everyone that uses Euphoria wants and extra 200k that they are
not using.
If I wanted to use OOP I would use I would use C++.
If I want smaller windows programs then I can use MIC's NQA.
>
> I can understand (and to a certain extent agree with) arguments about the
> inherent value of OOP, but this doesn't seem to bear any relation to
> what we're talking about here.
>
> Matt
Bernie
My files in archive:
WMOTOR, XMOTOR, W32ENGIN, MIXEDLIB, EU_ENGIN, WIN32ERU, WIN32API
Can be downloaded here:
http://www.rapideuphoria.com/cgi-bin/asearch.exu?dos=on&win=on&lnx=on&gen=on&keywords=bernie+ryan
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
