OpenEuphoria

Re: object oriented Euphoria...& comments

• Posted by Al Getz <Xaxo at aol.com> Jan 02, 2007
• 541 views

Hi there,

I've often thought about this myself.  We dont need another
programming language that is 'almost' the same as one that
is already out there and is also free.  But there are other
sides of this story too.
For one, oop components such as classes are just a natural
extension of programming itself.  Once you create hundreds
of programs you begin to realize something like this.  It's
just the natural order of things to want to arrange huge
collections of things in an orderly fashion, and classes do
in fact work out very well.  As you suggest they should be
optional, but they should also be included in case someone
wants to use them.


Take care,
Al

E boa sorte com sua programacao Euphoria!


My bumper sticker: "I brake for LED's"

 From "Black Knight":
"I can live with losing the good fight,
 but i can not live without fighting it".
"Well on second thought, maybe not."