Suggested Extension to Euphoria language
- Posted by Ad Rienks <Ad_Rienks at COMPUSERVE.COM> Feb 26, 1997
- 970 views
Hello Jef, I think that your proposed extension of the Euphoria language is unnecessary, since what you want can easily be done by a small global function. My automagic proposal is: function extract(sequence from, sequence index) -- returns indexed elements from a sequence sequence into into = repeat(0, length(index)) if index[length(index)] > length(from) then -- test for bad indexing puts(1, "BAD INDEX!\n") return 0 end if for magic = 1 to length(into) do -- or to length(index), that's the same into[magic] = from[index[magic]] end for return into end function -- extract -- test it --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------ sequence a, index_seq object b a = {10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100} index_seq = {3, 5, 7, 6, 9} -- the order is unimportant b = extract(a, index_seq) -- instead of b = a[index_seq] ? b while get_key() = -1 do end while --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------ The only problem is maybe somewhat less speed then an inbuild function, but there are so many things that we probably wanted to have build-in, like for instance pause(), wait(), input(), prompt(), round() etc. I think that small functions and procedures you write and then put to use as global in an include file, can contribute a lot to the use of the language. This ends my automagic soulution proposal, Bye, Ad.