OpenEuphoria

Re: EuGrid - was Runs w/Interpreter but not as .exe

• Posted by tubby.toast at ntlworld.com Dec 02, 2002
• 541 views

I rarely come out of lurk mode and have been waiting for someone else to
suggest this and can't believe that no-one, even Rob, has.  Rename
machine.e
to something else; rename safe.e to machine.e and run your program
unbound.
I have always tracked down errors of this nature this way.  Not guaranteed
but worth a try.

chris.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Craig" <rds at RapidEuphoria.com>
To: "EUforum" <EUforum at topica.com>
Sent: 01 December 2002 05:47
Subject: Re: EuGrid - was Runs w/Interpreter but not as .exe


>
> Jonas Temple writes:
> > In this case I'm really dead in the water, aren't I?  I have no way of
> > knowing where or why my program is crashing.  I even tried puts() and
> > flush() as you suggested.  When running the bound version with puts()
it
> > ran fine!  I'm starting to think that if I, as a programmer, want to
> > allow tracing of my bound program then that's my problem (unless the
> > security issue has to do with the internals of the interpreter).  Why
> > can't this be an option when creating a bound program?
>
> I'll reconsider the security issue for 2.4.
> Meanwhile, if adding puts() made it work,
> then maybe adding a few more calls to puts()
> will make it crash again. Or switching the order of some
> includes, or just about anything.
>
> This is frustrating, but for C/C++ programmers
> this is very common. They recompile their program
> in debug mode and the crash goes away.
>
> Or maybe just relax, run it unbound for a while,
> and wait for a better opportunity to debug it.
>
> Regards,
>    Rob Craig
>    Rapid Deployment Software
>    http://www.RapidEuphoria.com
>
>
>
>