Crash routine
I've been on this bandwagon a few times before; but I want to address some =
of the issues Rob brought up.
Reasons why a crash routine recovery system is better than a crash =
message:
1) I can display my message in any format I'd like: message box, popup =
graphics, help window, *NO CONSOLES*.
2) Say I have a 10 module program, each using different sets of data which =
are opened upon module entry and closed upon module exit. If there is a =
subscripting but in module 4 that causes a crash, I can still safely use =
the other 9 modules. But not if the program bombs out completely. A =
really good modular crash routine will display a pop-up error message, =
write a crash-analysis file to disk, disable the menu option that =
activates the module, close all files and controls associated with the =
module, and return control to the main menu. Maybe it could even email =
the crash file to an admin user who can fix the error at the same time the =
user is working in another module (since program code is stored in memory =
during execution). =20
Rob, please don't write this feature off too quickly. Added stability has =
never hurt a bottom line!
Michael J. Sabal
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|