Re: Portability, COM, and some interfacing

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

> As I think I've already stated on this list,
> I'm interested in making some source
> available, in some form, for a price,
> and with legal restrictions. I'm interested
> in growing my Euphoria income, not making
> everything free.

As I read this, I have a feeling you took little to/or none of what i've 
said to heart... *sigh*

> However, before I work out any details
> I have to finish the translator, namespace 
> enhancement, etc. and prepare a 2.3 release.
> (all of which have slipped another 15 minutes
> while I type this reply.  smile)

"all of which have slipped another 15 minutes while I type this 
reply"... Rob, dear, I'm quite sure this message took about 10 
minutes to 1) read, 2) think about, and 3) compose a reply. And, 
may I add, you have a life too (Gee, at least I hope you do), so it's 
slipped by far more than that.

While I can't stress enough the things needed to both the interpreter 
and translator, Rob, some of us just are having an absolute hard 
time keeping the ants out of our pants waiting for these 
enhancements. While I certainly hate to want to hasten you, you 
certainly should, and perhaps start creating a team of programmers, 
because the lone man is taking alot of (ab)use here, Rob.

Perhaps, even, (sorta) take the example of David Cuny's Win32Lib, 
except don't quite take it off your hands completely - We don't quite 
want a Bill Gates for Eu here :)

--"LEVIATHAN"

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu