OpenEuphoria

Re: Bug in get() and value(): embedded comments

• Posted by Jason Gade <jaygade at ya?o?.com> Jul 25, 2007
• 588 views

CChris wrote:
> * In the comments, it reads:
> "After reading one valid representation of a Euphoria object, ..."
> So now there is the possibility of several valid representations for an
> object;
> otherwise, "the" would have been used again instead.
> 
> And indeed, value() can cope with spaces inside a string that represents a
> sequence,
> so that the interpretation from the Comments section would seem to be the one
> to take into account.

BTW, I couldn't find this comment in the source of get.e.

I would assume, though, that the word "one" above was used as opposed to the
word "two" or "three" or whatever. I really don't think that it was intended to
imply more than one valid representation of an object.

--
"Any programming problem can be solved by adding a level of indirection."
--anonymous
"Any performance problem can be solved by removing a level of indirection."
--M. Haertel
"Premature optimization is the root of all evil in programming."
--C.A.R. Hoare
j.