Re: Linus Torvolds on open source
- Posted by Al Getz <Xaxo at ao?.co?> Jul 24, 2007
- 454 views
Jules wrote: > > In a recent interview, he said: > > > "I think the real issue about adoption of open source is that nobody can > really ever “design” a complex system. That’s simply not how things work: > people > aren’t that smart - nobody is. And what open source allows is to not actually > “design” things, but let them evolve, through lots of different pressures in > the market, and having the end result just continually improve. > > And doing so in the open, and allowing all these different entities to > cross-pollinate > their ideas with each other, and not having arbitrary boundaries with NDA’s > and “you cannot look at how we did this”, is just a better way. > > I compare it with science and witchcraft (or alchemy). Science may take > a few hundred years to figure out how the world works, but it does actually > get there, exactly because people can build on each others knowledge, and it > evolves over time. In contrast, witchcraft/alchemy may be about smart people, > but the knowledge body never “accumulates” anywhere. It might be passed down > to an apprentice, but the hiding of information basically means that it can > never really become any better than what a single person/company can > understand. > > And that’s exactly the same issue with open source vs proprietary > products. > The proprietary people can design something that is smart, but it eventually > becomes too complicated for a single entity (even a large company) to really > understand and drive, and the company politics and the goals of that company > will always limit it. > > In contrast, open source works well in a complex environment. Maybe nobody > at all understands the big picture, but evolution doesn’t require global > understanding, > it just requires small local improvements and a open market (”survival of the > fittest”). > > So I think a lot of companies are slowly starting to adopt more open > source, > simply because they see these things that work, and they realize that they > would > have a hard time duplicating it on their own. Do they really buy into my world > view? Probably not. But they can see it working for individual projects." > > I agree 100%. Maybe open source isn't so bad, after all. :) Hi there, Every programmer loves open source unless it's their own creation sometimes. I'd like to see MS Windows (XP, Vista) go open source (ha ha). Take care, Al E boa sorte com sua programacao Euphoria! My bumper sticker: "I brake for LED's" From "Black Knight": "I can live with losing the good fight, but i can not live without fighting it". "Well on second thought, maybe not."