Re: 1={}, is there really any other interpretation

new topic     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message 

I agree with Matt on this matter, we should only add '==' operator at this time
and take care not to brake existing code base when considering other
modifications.


regards,
Jacques Deschênes


Matt Lewis wrote:
> 
> 
> I definitely agree with this statement (#4).  I'm not sure if we really need
> to replace all the comparison ops.  A more reasonable solution to me
> would be to simply add '==' as a new op, where it's a synonym for
> equal().  If you've programmed in anything outside of Euphoria, you've
> probably used this a lot.
> 
> Matt

new topic     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu