Re: ? 1={}, is there really any other interpretation?

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Al Getz wrote:

<snip>

> Well, one could argue along two lines here:
> 1.  The smaller hole is not contained within the larger hole so big
>     hole still empty
> 2.  The smaller hole just makes the larger hole larger (extension).
> I guess that we could call this a 'system' of holes, that contains
> many holes, but that wouldnt be right either because we would have
> to have two words to describe this, system and holes, and a sequence
> is still just a sequence even if it holds other sequences.

<snip>

Other interesting thoughts about holes:
<http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/holes/>
smile

Regards,
   Juergen

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu