OpenEuphoria

Re: Sequence Ops

• Posted by jxliv7 <jxliv7 at hotm?il.com> Jul 15, 2007
• 579 views

to Rob and all the numerous others debating Euhporia:

i'm wondering if these sequence operations described might be useful in multiple
processor applications. that leads to some interesting parallel processing code
that might make Euphoria ahead of and simpler than what i see out there. i say
"see" because it's been too many years since i have wrapped my mind around
machine code, assembler, and all those details to "do".

i also look at the few 64-bit changes that are at the machine level/compiler
level and again see where Euphoria could be more useful to more programmers.

i'm going to have to adjust my time so i spend less time painting canvases and
get back into coding. Aside from sex, computers were my first love.

i do have a question: instead of changing the core syntax/operation of Euphoria,
wouldn't it be better/easier to put together include/DLL/API aps that to the
particular things you want...? couldn't enhancements (like == or +/x) be
interpreted at that level or would it have to be something that has to be done at
another further level...?

regards, etc.


--
jon