OpenEuphoria

Re: Source changes

• Posted by Jules <jdavy at dsl.pipex.?om> Jul 06, 2007
• 636 views

Matt Lewis wrote:
> 
> Gary Shingles wrote:
> > 
> > Either or I think.  You won't mess up your computer with VMWare, and it's
> > 'unlikely'
> > with CoLinux (the worst is trying to make a folder in a cofs mount, a native
> > windows folder accessible from windows, that will spontaneously reboot your
> > computer, not good, use sftp, or make folders in Windows, not Linux).
> > 
> > The VMWare route is much easier to get set up and you end up with a nice GUI
> > straight away.  The advantage of CoLinux is that it is not virtualised and
> > therefore
> > faster (except for networking which they haven't found a faster way to do
> > yet).
> >  You have a better chance of working with real devices, as long as Windows
> >  hasn't
> > grabbed them already.
> 
> The theory is that coLinux is faster, but I've had better luck with vmware.
> Plus, you don't have to install anything extra to get a good GUI with vmware.
> Getting x working with coLinux is a bit of a hassle.  I used a the cygwin
> x client, and it was also really slow.  VNC or something else may work a lot
> better.  I've had a lot of success with NX Machine for doing remote linux
> sessions, but I never tried it with coLinux.

anyone tried this one? it's new on the scene, but looks pretty good.

http://www.virtualbox.org