OpenEuphoria

Re: Source changes

• Posted by CChris <christian.cuvier at agric?lture.gouv.fr> Jul 04, 2007
• 649 views

Bernie Ryan wrote:
> 
> CChris wrote:
> > 
> > A flat, unmitigated no here.
> > Any looney tune could block anything for any kind of fancied up fallacy.
> 
> Do you think that every idea that you have is perfect

No.

> and beyond veto ?

Neither, just saying that a veto is a very powerful weapon and that the fewer
people have it, the better. Many ideas only need improvements, not a veto, and a
dynamic, constructive community is usually a good source of them.
You should perhaps visit other language forums/lists to get the idea.

The above proposal implies that, to allow something being done, no one should
disagree - otherwise there will be a veto. This amounts to total immobility, as
there will always be someone against any given item/feature/idea if only for the
sake of it, as repeatedly seen on this list for years. Which has proven harmful
in countless contexts, Eu being just one of them.

CChris

> 
> Bernie
> 
> My files in archive:
> WMOTOR, XMOTOR, W32ENGIN, MIXEDLIB, EU_ENGIN, WIN32ERU, WIN32API 
> 
> Can be downloaded here:
> <a
> href="http://www.rapideuphoria.com/cgi-bin/asearch.exu?dos=on&win=on&lnx=on&gen=on&keywords=bernie+ryan">http://www.rapideuphoria.com/cgi-bin/asearch.exu?dos=on&win=on&lnx=on&gen=on&keywords=bernie+ryan</a>