OpenEuphoria

Re: Source changes

• Posted by Juergen Luethje <j.lue at gmx.?e> Jul 04, 2007
• 612 views

CChris wrote:

> Pete Lomax wrote:

<snip>

>> I thought about a using a sourceforge forum, but EuWiki seemed better: While
>> most discussion should remain on EUforum, set up "Intent to port" page(s), as
>> a place for anyone to post a "formal" (and carefully considered) veto. The
>> purpose
>> is to maintain an apt summary, vs the 84,000 messages in Euforum, to control
>> migration of code from "bleeding edge" to "stable".
>> 
>> A veto can be logged by anyone and for any reason: inadequately documented,
>> I need a stable release, this code shows a bug, breaks this bit of legacy
>> code,
>> etc. You must have a valid (and unique?) reason though, and of course you are
>> allowed to delete your veto if you change your mind.
>> 
> 
> A flat, unmitigated no here.
> Any looney tune could block anything for any kind of fancied up fallacy. There
> had been someone like that in the past years, and there is another one these
> days.

This is not a flat "No" but just some more flat polemics from you.
Get your facts first, and then you can distort them as you please.

Regards,
   Juergen