Re: dll.e question
- Posted by CChris <christian.cuvier at ag?iculture.gouv.fr> Jul 01, 2007
- 634 views
Hayden McKay wrote: > > I think I've seen a similar post for this before. I could probably do some > testing > to figure this out but heres may question anyway... > > I want to use KERNEL32.DLL-GetProcAddress() to get the address of a c routine, > I have some embedded asm code that uses c funcs and i want to link it > staticly, > ie: the returned addresses will either be from a *.dll or a *.so file... > anyway > i want to know if I can pass dll.e's open_dll() return value to > GetProcAddress() > or do I have to use GetModuleHandle() or LoadLibrary() to aquire the correct > handle? The entry point that open_dll() returns is good for Windows, as shown in the dsearch.exw demo program. Hopefully the same holds under Linux for .so files. CChris