Re: for loop ?
Gabriel you wrote
>>Because that kind of thing would cause more problems than it would solve.
>>When you come across a "for" loop in a Euphoria program, you are
>>absolutely
>>*guaranteed* that the counter is controlled solely by the "for" loop, and
>>*cannot* be changed unexpectedly by the programmer. This can help greatly
>>with debugging, since you *know* the loop counter can't be messed about
>>with.
I have enough concentration and am smart enough to keep track of what is
happening in my for loops. I don't need no guarantees.
Thank you but I didn't need training in how to use a while loop.
Be seeing you,
Bernie
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
