Re: VisualBasic Look-a-like
C.K. Lester wrote:
>Use Llama.
Why should I use llama? you didn't give any arguments, witch, I prefer, =
is a pretty required thing when announcing something in a list like =
this. Nothing personal... many people (including myself) give this kind =
of opinions without any explanation once in a while. But it just isn't =
very nice for those who receive the message without even participating =
to the conversation and for those it has been mented to(now I have to =
ask you the simple question "why?" (and now everybody are receiving this =
message o' mine witch is quite an useless for 'em)
Again, don't take this personally, I'm sure you were meaning nothing but =
good. I just think that messages without arguments,questions or answer =
shouldn't be send to the list. What do you others think?
I did check llama all over again, but I'm not sure if I'm going to use =
it now. As David wrote, the menus are missing. But what I'd like to =
know, are the benefits between llama and win32lib.=20
Have you(David) been working with win32lib anymore or have you been =
fully consentrating to llama? Will win32lib be developed further? What I =
understood from your llama docs is that llama is much easier to use than =
win32lib (suits me :). If you could add those menus in the llama I might =
do my Editor by using it. Afterall, you're upgrading it all the time, =
right?
--Tapu "3D is my other name"
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
