Re: SQLite wrappers
don cole wrote:
>
> Tone ,
>
> I checked out you tutorial and found it to be very clear and precise and
>
> interesting.
>
> Although I tickered the C Borland tutorial, I never got into it too much
>
> because I thought C was too complicated (which is why I chose Euphoria as my
>
> primary language).
>
> However should I deleve into C further I will keep your tutorial in mind.
>
> Also from your tutorial I can see how C and Euphoria are closely related.
>
>
> Kat,
>
> All the lines in your messages end in =
>
> then on the next line one character follows and then next line.
>
> Making it very hard on the eyes too read.
>
> I don't know what's up with that.
>
> Just thought I'd let you know.
>
> Don Cole,
> SF
>
C, at its most basic (no pun intended), is about as easy as Euphoria. When you
get past doing the most simplistic programs, though, is when you need to worry
about some of the same things that assembly-language programmers have to worry
about -- namely storage allocation and keeping track of types. This is where
Euphoria has its strengths.
C++ is the same way. That is, it is simple until you scratch beneath the
surface.
The best point about Euphoria is its simple value-based semantics. You, the
programmer, know that everything can be boiled down to a value. C is kind of like
this too but it is much more complicated. This is actually the key behind C++
templates and so-called generic programming which is definitely too complicated
for me to understand. That is what makes Euphoria great.
j.
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
