Re: 32-bit random numbers
- Posted by Pete Lomax <petelomax at blueyonder.co.uk> Jul 03, 2004
- 567 views
On Sat, 03 Jul 2004 20:44:00 +0200, Juergen Luethje <j.lue at gmx.de> wrote: >That's what Derek's code does, too, if I understand it correctly. >If two highly skilled software-engineers say so, I think it's not a bad >idea.I was about to suggest the same, but was beaten to it
As I think was said, I would also have noted that #00010001, #00020002, etc will be less likely., but then again rand() itself is not perfect. Pete
