Re: New version of StoreInc.ex
- Posted by DB James <larch at adelphia.net> Aug 14, 2005
- 508 views
Juergen Luethje wrote: > > DB James wrote: > > > Juergen Luethje wrote: > >> > >> DB James wrote: > >> > >>> I have uploaded a new version of StoreInc.ex that addresses the long > >>> filename issue. > >> > >> That's probably because you included part of my DOS LFN library. > >> You carefully removed my name, though. Congragulations! > >> > >> <snip> > >> > > > > Hi Juergen, > > > > You're quite wrong about "carefully removed my name". I have always > > wanted everyone who creates anything to have a credit listing in every > > context. The problem, in my opinion arises when personal attention to > > that issue is needed. > > Why is this a problem? > In the files "file_ln.e", "Lfn.e", and "LfnRead.txt" it is and was clearly > stated who the author is. Are you able to read and write? > > > My program Mash.ex routinely clips out comments > > external to the main file and external to functions. > > Aaah, it is Mash.ex's fault? > > > If your name were > > listed within any routine, it would be there for all the world to see. > > Oooh no, it's probably my fault that you removed my name from my program! > > > (By the way, thanks very much for your LFN library). > > This is a strange way of showing your gratitude ... > > <snip> > > Regards, > Juergen Hello Juergen, These comments of yours are out-of-date. The problem has been fixed and the fix has been announced. I also had the offending program withdrawn. The problem arose when I had my nose too close to the programming issue of compacting an overly large file, and did not take into account the importance of retaining the author information. That was a mistake on my part, but not an attempt to harm anyone. When two people brought it to my attention, I tried to explain how it came about, and I then repaired the program so that the issue would not come up again. That is the way it is supposed to work to correct errors. Try to understand the difference between deliberate disregard and a mistake. --Quark