Re: type string
Bernie Ryan <bwryan at PCOM.NET> wrote...
>Why don't you guys write your string type in assembler
>then you can do recursion, short cutting, or what ever you want.
..later he wrote...
>Dan I am talking about using assembler written Euphoria.
..and then he wrote...
>Please explain to me how a windows type framework for
>C++ fits into using Euphoria.
?!?!? Bernie, I'm sure you mean well, but I don't think anybody else here
knows what you're trying to say. Please be clearer and more specific.
jiri babor <jbabor at PARADISE.NET.NZ> wrote:
>Btw and quite generally, if people think a bit more carefully about the
>questions they want to ask, spend more time formulating them and include
>just a bit more background information, they will get their answers much
>quicker, more reliably and save a lot of frustrating guesswork to their
>helpers.
Amen to that!
Be seeing you,
-- Gabriel Boehme
---------------------
The obligatory quote:
"It is wrong to fiddle while Rome is burning; but it is quite right to study
the theory of hydraulics while Rome is burning."
-- G.K. Chesterton
---------------------
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
