Re[2]: Coming real soon!
francis at gmx.co.uk schrieb am 22.07.2001:
>What Euphoria needs is a base API library, from which every other
>windows library is built apon.
That's it!
>...But how about a bit of creative engineering? With a Win32 base
>library covering (hopefully the entire) API, Win32Lib could just
>include this before declaring its own routines for (in my opinion)
>superior engineered code.
Unfortunately this is so.
>Does everyone who wants to step ahead into the more complex
>and faster waters beyond Win32lib have to spend hours upon hours
>manually creating the masterpiece of API definition?
Nobody should do this 
>Still, besides how far off the point this thread is going to be
>argued, who can criticise Bernie here for what he's doing? Who can
>possibly argue that Euphoria(Win32) does not need this library?
>Hello?
Not me ... and I'm really impatient waiting on Bernie's library ))
>I fullheartedly support Bernie with this brave endeavour. If
>completed I will definitely be "including" it in my code.
Me too.
>I believe
>it is a positive step forward to simplify the first aspect of low
>level (or any level-library) programming for Euphoria.
I agree and I think it's a way to make Windows programming with
Euphoria much better and forces then also other high-level libraries
using such a base include.
Markus
Markus Vedder-Kemnitzer
vekem at gmx.de
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
