RE: non-x86 development
you really know your stuff :) anyway, i'm /sorta/ biased toward the 68k,
since i've never seen much PowerPC stuff. but when i said "non-x86
development", i wasn't just talking about 68k stuff. there's also
PowerPC, SPARC, etc. I suppose the assembly part is why robert didn't
port it to other architectures, but with a small handful of non-x86
programmers, i suppose robert could just pick some assembly files when
he was compiling Eu for some architecture, or another set for another
architecture
martin.stachon at worldonline.cz wrote:
> I looked at few pieces of code, and MacOS API seems more complicated to
> me than WIN32 API.
i hear ya, brother
> ':' instead of '\\', but creating GUI apps would be dfficult.
yeah, especially since the Mac OS seems less centered around shared
libraries than other OSes
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
