OpenEuphoria

Re: A proposal on scope

• Posted by Kat <gertie at PELL.NET> Jul 15, 2001
• 442 views

On 16 Jul 2001, at 1:32, Gerardo wrote:


> 
> Travis,
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Travis Beaty" <travis_n_marylou at yahoo.com>
> To: "EUforum" <EUforum at topica.com>
> Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2001 11:22 PM
> Subject: Re: A proposal on scope
> 
> 
> > > Turn the page upside down?

I did that,, and put as many lines on the scrren as possible, then built a 
fresnel lens to project it onto the wall, that gave me 400 lines from ceiling to
floor, but it wasn't enough. Then i tried scrolling, and now i haveto build a
new
wall. <sigh>

> >
> > I tested your suggestion, without success.  Everything I tried to puts()
> > test onto the screen, it came out backwards, and the interpreter is
> > complaining about backwards references and inverted assignments.  But
> > then again, it has also given me a relevation of how they created
> > Windows.  Suggestion for 2.3, Mr. Craig ... please allow upside-down
> > code ... or build another interpreter for the task, named wxe.exe.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Travis
> 
> Do you think, then, that wxe syntax should accept stup() instead of puts()?
> And,
> of course, esrever() ? No big change on motas, but secneuqes will become
> rather

Sheesh, exceptions in the language already! You said "motas", but then 
used "secneuqes"! Shouldn't it have been either "smota" or "ecneuqess"?? I 
can't work like this,, tell me when it's out of beta! Sheesh!

taK