Re: Food For Thought
- Posted by euman at bellsouth.net Jul 03, 2001
- 349 views
Euphoria is good enough for me. If you truely want to do things in Euphoria especially in Windows, learning how might take some time but I think its worth the effort to learn how the WinAPI works The hardest part for me was accepting this, feeding and returning strings from structures in the API here is the solution: atom = alloc_string(peek_string(struct_pointer)) -- return Pete Eberlein wrote an alloc_string and a peek_string function and made this pretty easy. Virtually any program you can write in Win in C can be done in Euphoria. You just have to stick with it, learn it and apply it. Make note to not try and rely on Win32lib but instead try figureing out the MS-SDK material. Finding your own style or method will make things easy. This will also make writeing programs that use Win32lib much faster because you can actually see how the program works. If you dont believe me then continue to do it the hard way and become frustrated when Win32lib wont do something that you want it to. Asking questions about a function in win32lib wont always turn up an answer you're gonna have to rely and fall back on the ability to look at and read the SDK. So why not start there first. I keep hearing that Euphoria is somewhat substandard from a select few and I completely disagree. Euphoria has abilities and features I believe are untapped by anyone. Euman euman at bellsouth.net ----- Original Message ----- From: <president at insight-concepts.com> To: "EUforum" <EUforum at topica.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 12:01 Subject: Re: Food For Thought Hello SR, I agree with the following: SR Wrote: We come off as whiners sometimes, but the Eu pace of progress is slow. We get frustrated. I don't remember when I registered, but it was at least a year ago. I'm still waiting for namespaces so that it will be feasible to make a modular GUI library. I quit using Eu for a long time because I got frustrated waiting for changes, either in the language or in the quality of the includes and their documentation. --------------------------------Response----------------------------- I agree with your statement and this is what I have been saying all along. Eu definitely needs changes, but the most serious changes needs to be made with the Libraries themselves. There are so many areas we have not touched with EU. David/Derek win32Lib Judith's IDE Thomas Irregular Windows and other Libraries are making the language more appealing. But there is so more needed. We all agree the Namespace issue has to be dealt with. That is the one thing everyone has agreed on, but how to implement this is the problem.