OpenEuphoria

Re: Proposal for 'math.e' (2007-08-23)

• Posted by Robert Craig <rds at RapidEupho?i?.com> Aug 29, 2007
• 685 views

Juergen Luethje wrote:
> In the meantime, CChris suggested not to use the name "statistics.e",
> but to use "stats.e" instead.
> 
> Concerning the other points, there was no serious disagreement.
> So maybe you can now make the following official decisions:
> - There is agreement on the file name "compare.e".
> - There is agreement on the file name "math.e".
> - There is agreement, that no new global routines, constants or variables
>   will be added to the first release of "math.e"
>   ( The functions gamma(), part_gamma() and erf() will be contained in
>     the next proposal for "math.e" or "stat(istic)s.e". )
> 
> Making this official decision would allow me to continue, i.e. to post
> the most recent proposals for "math.e" and "compare.e".

I don't see any problem with using "statistics.e".
So go ahead with that.
Even the DOS version of Euphoria can open an existing 
non-8.3 filename for read or write. It just can't *create* 
a new one (and even that could be fixed if someone took the initiative).

Regards,
   Rob Craig
   Rapid Deployment Software
   http://www.RapidEuphoria.com