Re: Proposal for 'math.e' (2007-08-23)

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Robert Craig wrote:

> Juergen Luethje wrote:
> > 
> > c.k.lester wrote:
> > 
> > > Jules wrote:
> > > 
> > > > do you not think Gamma and erf are too specialized and advanced for
> > > > a basic math library?...
> > > 
> > > I would vote for three separate include files:
> > > 
> > > math.e (basic math)
> > > statistics.e (statistics)
> > > compare.e (min/max)
> > 
> > I'd vote exactly for the same.
> 
> Me too.
> Unless someone disagrees strongly in the next few days,
> maybe we can at least agree to break it down into 
> those three file names.

And also, unless someone disagrees strongly in the next few days,
hopefully we can agree to stop suggesting new functions (or constants
or whatever) for the first release of "math.e" (*). Otherwise there will
never be a release of it.

Regards,
   Juergen

(*) This does of course not apply to erf() and friends, which already
    _have been_ suggested.

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu