Type - Start Again
- Posted by Salix <salix at f?eem?il.hu> Aug 19, 2007
- 527 views
Hello, Playing with Peter Robinson's suggestion I realized that many of my existing codes could have been simplified by his example.
type customer(sequence x) integer x[1] as id sequence x[2] as name sequence x[3] as address end type
Type definitions could replace the currently needed
constant id=1 constant name=2 constant address=3 type customer(sequence x) if length(x)=3 and integer(x[id]) and sequence(x[name]) and sequence(x[address]) then return 1 else return 0 end if end type
(Although he suggested using "." instead of "as".) Most of the answers replied to his general comment but I would like to hear your opinion on the simplification shown above. What do you think? Kind regards, Salix