OpenEuphoria

Re: Building Euphoria -- what am I missing?

• Posted by Jason Gade <jaygade at y?hoo.?om> Aug 14, 2007
• 566 views

Matt Lewis wrote:
> 
> Jason Gade wrote:
> > 
> > Okay, tried that under Windows and it didn't work. I noticed that "wmake -f
> > makefile.wat interpreter=1" only makes exwc.exe. No exw. Translator still
> > fails.
> > I still need to check Linux and see whether any executables were made.
> 
> What happens when you run:
> 
> > wmake -f makefile.wat clean && wmake -f makefile.wat translator=1

I'll try it tonight and let you know.

> 
> Yes, it only makes exwc.exe right now, because that's all I really ever 
> use (and no one else seems to use the makefiles right now).  It's been 
> on my todo list to make both...

Well, can the makefile call makecon.exw in the bin directory? Or make a Euphoria
program that is the reverse of makecon.exw? I pretty much just use exwc as well
but if I'm testing stuff it would be nice to be complete.

> 
> > Hmm. Just exu.
> 
> Again, try
> 
> $ make clean translator
> 
> $ make clean library
> 
> The GNU make syntax is easier for me, and that's why the command line 
> syntax is slightly different.
>  
> Matt

Alright. Also I believe that make has a command line switch that can trace a
makefile instead of executing it. I might try that if I still experience
problems.

Thanks again for the help.

--
A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a simple
system that works.
--John Gall's 15th law of Systemantics.

"Premature optimization is the root of all evil in programming."
--C.A.R. Hoare

j.