OpenEuphoria

Re: wxEuphoria v. 0.10 vs Ubuntu

• Posted by Jerry Story <story.jerry at gmai??com> Aug 03, 2007
• 492 views

Matt Lewis wrote:
> 
> Jerry Story wrote:
> > 
> > Did anyone besides Matt Lewis get wxEuphoria version 0.10 working on
> > Ubuntu?
> > If so, how?
> > 
> > Does anyone besides me have a problem getting wxEuphoria version 0.10
> > to work on Ubuntu?
> > 
> > I'm stuck on version 0.9 until this problem is solved.
> 
> It looks like Jason was able to get the updated Ubuntu binary to work
> on his version of Feisty:
> 
> <a
> href="http://wxeuphoria.sf.net/libwxeu.so.tar.gz">http://wxeuphoria.sf.net/libwxeu.so.tar.gz</a>
> 
> Just as a refresher, here's how to install:
> 
> Download and decompress libwxeu.so.  Copy to "/usr/local/lib" (or, "/usr/lib",
> in which case you should substitute that path below).
> Run:
> 
> $ sudo ldconfig /usr/local/lib
> 
> Confirm that it worked:
> 
> $ ldconfig -p | grep libwxeu
>         libwxeu.so (libc6) => /usr/local/lib/libwxeu.so
> 
> Now you should have the correct binary being loaded.  The binary at the
> above URL links to the Feisty-repository provided wxWidgets libraries.
> On my system:
> 
> $ ldd /usr/local/lib/libwxeu.so | grep wx
>         libwx_gtk2u_aui-2.8.so.0 => /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_aui-2.8.so.0
>         (0xb7f1c000)
>         libwx_gtk2u_xrc-2.8.so.0 => /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_xrc-2.8.so.0
>         (0xb7e87000)
>         libwx_gtk2u_qa-2.8.so.0 => /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_qa-2.8.so.0
>         (0xb7e66000)
>         libwx_gtk2u_html-2.8.so.0 => /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_html-2.8.so.0
>         (0xb7dc7000)
>         libwx_gtk2u_adv-2.8.so.0 => /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_adv-2.8.so.0
>         (0xb7d05000)
>         libwx_gtk2u_core-2.8.so.0 => /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.8.so.0
>         (0xb797d000)
>         libwx_baseu_xml-2.8.so.0 => /usr/lib/libwx_baseu_xml-2.8.so.0
>         (0xb7973000)
>         libwx_baseu_net-2.8.so.0 => /usr/lib/libwx_baseu_net-2.8.so.0
>         (0xb7944000)
>         libwx_baseu-2.8.so.0 => /usr/lib/libwx_baseu-2.8.so.0 (0xb77e8000)

Bingo!!!
It works!!!

Now is there any chance of automating the process with apt
(Advanced Packaging Tool)?