Re: math.e and misc.e
- Posted by jacques deschĂȘnes <desja at glo?etrotte?.net> Aug 02, 2007
- 468 views
My preference goes to rad_to_deg() and deg_to_rad() but rad2deg() and deg2rad() are acceptable. regards, Jacques DeschĂȘnes Juergen Luethje wrote: > > Jason Gade wrote: > > > Derek Parnell wrote: > > > I tend to agree with Pete on this one. Returning just the index will give > > > better > > > performance and it can be used in an expression whereas returning the > > > {inx,val} > > > combination cannot be used in a 'value' expression ... > > > > > > if blah[largest(blah)] ... -- okay > > > > > > if blah[largest(blah)[2]] ... -- fails > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Derek Parnell > > > Melbourne, Australia > > > Skype name: derek.j.parnell > > > > I'm gonna throw my opinion behind Juergen, Pete, and Derek here. I think > > that > > Juergen has the most elegant solution so far. > > Thanks. > > Matt suggested to change the names of the functions deg() and rad(). > He proposed to use > rad_to_deg() and deg_to_rad() > or > rad2deg() and deg2rad(). > > Which one do you, and others, prefer? > > Regards, > Juergen