Re: An useful addition to sort.e
Jason Gade wrote:
>
> Matt Lewis wrote:
> > I've often coded:
> > }}}
<eucode>
> > s = - sort( -s )
> > </eucode>
{{{
> Huh, I haven't tested that but... wouldn't that take longer than reverse() by
> some constant factor? I mean, first the -1 has to propagate through the
> sequence
> argument and then it has to propagate again through the sorted sequence.
>
> Interesting though. Probably worth testing.
>
It's possible, although it's always been fast enough for me. I think it's
pretty rare to have to frequently do a sort, so it's not particularly time
critical. It probably also depends on the size of the data that's being
sorted.
Matt
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|