Re: "OF" in types, yet again...

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message 

Sorry... the attachment was stripped out.
It can be found here: http://users.secsme.org.au/~prbarnes/misc/oth/of.zip
RobC, any comments?

On Sat, 3 Jul 2004 11:22:10 +1000, Patrick Barnes <mrtrick at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> At the suggestion that I implement a test system to show how effective
> the "of" type can be, I have done so....
> 
> Run benchmarks.ex to see how it performs on your machine.
> To change the number of iterations, change constants.e.
> 
> "of" is at least 20 times faster at 10,000 records.
> 
> Everyone, what do you think? See test_of.ex for example.
> --
> MrTrick
> 
> 
> 
> 


-- 
MrTrick

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu