Re: IL examples

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Igor Kachan wrote:
> Ok, but I am sleeping and seeing EU 2.5+x on a single 1.44 floppy!
> Really we have now 3 backends for DOS - the first one in the ex.exe,
> the second one in the ec.exe and the third one as a stand alone
> backend.exe, right?
> Same picture with Win32. 3 backends in one package.
> Let us use the "delete double" method here.
> Why not, if I am not wrong in my calculations?   smile

I need all 6 .exe's. There's not much I can do about it.
You need a different .exe format to run a Windows program
vs. a DOS program.
 
> > > Now backend*.exes just hang up in the air and no one can
> > > see what is an .il file.
> > 
> > That's true. 
> > Though there's not much to see in a .il. 
> > Just a bunch of random characters all over your screen. smile
> 
> Yes, of course, "just a bunch" and "all over".  smile
> But people'd like to see some working IL code, I think.
> Say, some shrouded demo-program, maybe, without open
> source code. Just to avoid additional questions.

Those who register the Binder will see that the Binder
is in fact a .il file.

The binder/shrouder can bind or shroud itself.
The interpreter can interpret itself.
The translator can translate itself.
and all three can do their thing to the other two  smile

Anyway, I understand what you mean. I'll think about it.
 
> > I thought about just giving backend*.exe to those who register
> > and letting them distribute it along with their apps, 
> > but it's better for the community if everyone has it automatically.
> 
> Yes, I love to see the backend*.exes in the main package.
> 
> Then, just a thought, it seems to me, translators may be combined
> into a single multiplatform IL-based E-2-C translator.
> What to do, dreams, dreams, dreams   smile

Yes that would be possible.
I'd still have as much testing to do,
but fewer files to worry about.
Although people with slow machines might get impatient
when translating something big.
I guess I'm content with the way I'm doing it now.

Thanks,
   Rob Craig
   Rapid Deployment Software
   http://www.RapidEuphoria.com

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu