OpenEuphoria

Re: documentation errors

• Posted by Robert Craig <rds at RapidEuphoria.com> Nov 25, 2004
• 678 views

Jason Gade wrote:
> Okay, so is there any reason for you to stick with the Watcom compiler?  Can
> you try

Yes. It's quite solid and generates excellent code.

Now that I think of it, I'm not even using Watcom's
heap manager any more on Windows, only on DOS. 
I'm using Microsoft's heap. The problem was the huge number
of free blocks I was suddenly creating, and also the 
large amount of memory I was using. I use a lot less memory now.
Any heap manager can have peculiar situations where its
performance drops off badly.

> say the <a href="http://www.digitalmars.com" title="Digital Mars C/C++"/a>
> 
> Also, Digital Mars D language has a lot of features similar to Euphoria
> sequences in
> a compiled language.  Could it be used to implement Euphoria?

Probably, but I already support 7 C compilers,
any of which can be used to build the interpreter.
I really don't want to test another, thanks.

Regards,
   Rob Craig
   Rapid Deployment Software
   http://www.RapidEuphoria.com