Re: [EuForum] Definition of insanity...
- Posted by Patrick Barnes <mrtrick at gmail.com> Nov 23, 2004
- 521 views
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 03:16:02 -0800, Tone =C5=A0koda <guest at rapideuphoria.co= m> wrote: > posted by: Tone =C5=A0koda <tskoda at email.si> > > Patrick Barnes wrote: > > > > Doing the same thing twice and getting different results... > > For this kind of bugs a "history debugger" would be nice: a debugger whic= h records all statements executed and info what values variables had. Then = when program crashes or something works wrong you can stop program executio= n and debug for back, ie when debugging you can jump back to any statement = in code which was executed, not only (one statement) forward, like in norma= l debuggers. You could also search for a condition, ie var=val. > > The problem with such debugger would be that it program execution work qu= ite slow, both because it would use execute.e and would have to record all = that info to hard drive, and it would produce gigabytes large debug files. > > I'm not sure if it would be really that useful, considering it is needed = quite a lot of work to create such debugger. But it could be it would be VE= RY useful. It would... but I've found the reason for the uncertainty... There is a bug in IPC.ew that is not queueing data but overwriting it if a procedure is remotely called multiple times before it's processed. Fixing it requires fixing IPC.... a prospect I *don't* relish. -- MrTrick ----------