Re: Rob: Suggestions for Euphoria 2.6

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message 

Patrick Barnes wrote:
> Uh, I thought that a file, once included, was never included again?
> i.e. if A includes B and C, and B includes C, then there is still only
> a single instance of C internally.

Yes, you are right. My mistake.
Maybe there's no point in having a limit.
Although it might be nicer for the interpreter to
tell you that you have a large number of nested includes,
rather than giving a cryptic message when it suddenly 
fails to open a file.

Regards,
   Rob Craig
   Rapid Deployment Software
   http://www.RapidEuphoria.com

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu