Re: v2.5 suggestions

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Robert Craig wrote:

> Andy Serpa wrote:
>> How about a specific constant we can use with abort() that will trigger the
>> crash routines?
>>  abort(1/0) will work, I suppose, but abort(FATAL_ERROR) might be more
>>  elegant.  Also,
>> a way to reset or re-order multiple crash routines would probably come in
>> handy.
>
> Thanks for the suggestion.
> When I get more feedback from several people, I'll see what improvements
> can be made.

Just a minor idea: Since we always have to pass the routine_id of a
*function* to crash_routine() -- not a routine_id of a procedure --,
maybe it would be a little more intuitive to call it "crash_function()"
rather than "crash_routine()"?

<snip>

Regards,
   Juergen

-- 
Have you read a good program lately?

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu