Re: Eu 2.5 improvements over Eu 2.4
- Posted by "Unkmar" <L3Euphoria at bellsouth.net> Nov 22, 2004
- 620 views
----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Craig" <guest at RapidEuphoria.com> To: <EUforum at topica.com> Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2004 10:08 PM Subject: Re: Eu 2.5 improvements over Eu 2.4 > > posted by: Robert Craig <rds at RapidEuphoria.com> > > spent memory wrote: >> Can someone list the major improvements of 2.5 over 2.4, > > http://www.rapideuphoria.com/relnotes.htm > >> after reading >> many posts and looking through info i haven't found much reason to >> install the 2.5 that's been sitting on my desktop for 2 days. > > Once people start using $ and crash_routine(), and posting > that code to the Archive, you'll have to install 2.5. Or not use the archives. I've done pretty well without 2.4 so far. [Snip] > Some people complained about speed, then discovered it > was their mistake, or something weird in their setup. BTW, Winwire is working after a reboot. WinXP doesn't usually need a reboot. :( [Snip] > The install program had a couple of people in hysterics > because it changed one of their Euphoria file associations. > They didn't realize you could just right click and set it > back in a few seconds. I was and am well aware of a few clicks to set things back. I shouldn't have to set them BACK. They shouldn't change. I still haven't installed it on THIS computer because of those changes. > Some wisdom I've gained after doing this for many years > is this: > You can never satisfy the demand for new features by > providing new features. You just make it worse! > When you give people something new, the first thing > they do is start asking for enhancements of what you've > given them. > > By giving people an open source Euphoria, they immediately > starting demanding more openness, and more ways to use the > open source, and they get upset when they can't have it > right away. I haven't read much into the euphoria in euporia interpretter yet. I will have plenty to learn from with it. I thank you for that. I think ! After all, I'm not sure that I will take the time to go through it. It runs, most of the time. I've been getting some error about many of the DOS32 programs not being able to run in this system or something like that. They run without going through ex eu.ex but they don't run through ex eu.ex :( > The people on this list who tend to be the most negative, > also tend to be people who have been on this list for many > years, and apparently have not found anything better > to use than Euphoria in all that time. > > Having said that, I must admit that it's negative > comments that are more likely to push me into improving > Euphoria. Too many positive comments and I might just > crack open a beer and go watch a DVD for a couple of > hours instead of trying to improve things. > > Regards, > Rob Craig > Rapid Deployment Software > http://www.RapidEuphoria.com