Re: serialize software
- Posted by "Unkmar" <L3Euphoria at bellsouth.net> Nov 18, 2004
- 474 views
----- Original Message ----- From: "cklester" <guest at RapidEuphoria.com> To: <EUforum at topica.com> Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2004 11:45 AM Subject: Re: serialize software > > > posted by: cklester <cklester at yahoo.com> > > Unkmar wrote: >> >> > posted by: George Walters <gwalters at sc.rr.com> >> > >> > I mean that it would only run on that specific computer. Perhaps tied to >> > the nic or hard drive >> > id or some other id of the </font></i> computer. >> >> Hard Drives fail. NIC's Fail, Components Fail. >> People Upgrade and this Tagging process PREVENTS people >> from upgrading. > > It's not that big a deal, actually. We have thousands of clients and > most of them upgrade. It's just a matter of reinstalling the software > with us on the phone. The company I mention is only reachable 1 day a week. Thursday. > You have to reinstall everything anyway... it just so happens that for > this particular software you'll need a code or something. Soon, our > stuff will be automated so it will be a standard-looking install with > the license verification going on in the background. I haven't reinstalled mIRC or Euphoria in many years. I don't have to install most any product when I do a drive copy. Apparently the registry entries work as authentication without a hardware authentification process. >> My uncle suffers this Monopolistic pain daily. > > It's not monopolistic. It's just a license protection scheme. If you > don't agree to the provisions of the license agreement, DON'T USE THE > SOFTWARE. It's simple. :) > >> He is STUPID enough to have repeatedly purchase upgraded >> versions of an astrological software that Can't be moved from >> computer to computer. > > Since when does anybody move software from computer to computer on such > a periodic basis as to make this intolerable?! Besides software pirates, > I mean. Let's assume he has computers with 3 legit copies. Which he does. Just so happens that all 3 copies are different versions. For obvious reasons. He buys a computer so he puts a new copy on it. He puts the most recent upgrade on the oldest copy he has. Now, lets assume a system failure once per year. That leaves room for the HD or mobo or Windows to take a dump. That gives you 1 marked component failure per system per 3 years. That is if you consider Windows as a component. With 3 computers, that is 3 failures a year. You can call this as hypothetical as you like. I call it a royal pain. >> Aggravation: Can't share it. But then, he isn't suppose to. > > Duh. > >> Infuriating: Can't replace or upgrade his computer. > > I doubt this is true. A call to the software maker should get him > reinstalled quickly and easily. That's how it works with us, at least. Yes it does. On any Thursday. Heaven forbidden his computer to crash on a Friday. He would have to wait and entire week for that software to be running again. > -=ck > "Programming in a state of EUPHORIA." > http://www.cklester.com/euphoria/ unkmar