Re: serialize software

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "cklester" <guest at RapidEuphoria.com>
To: <EUforum at topica.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2004 11:45 AM
Subject: Re: serialize software


> 
> 
> posted by: cklester <cklester at yahoo.com>
> 
> Unkmar wrote:
>> 
>> > posted by: George Walters <gwalters at sc.rr.com>
>> >
>> > I mean that it would only run on that specific computer. Perhaps tied to
>> > the nic or hard drive
>> > id or some other id of the </font></i> computer.
>> 
>> Hard Drives fail. NIC's Fail, Components Fail.
>> People Upgrade and this Tagging process PREVENTS people
>> from upgrading.
> 
> It's not that big a deal, actually. We have thousands of clients and
> most of them upgrade. It's just a matter of reinstalling the software
> with us on the phone.

The company I mention is only reachable 1 day a week.  Thursday.

> You have to reinstall everything anyway... it just so happens that for
> this particular software you'll need a code or something. Soon, our
> stuff will be automated so it will be a standard-looking install with
> the license verification going on in the background.

I haven't reinstalled mIRC or Euphoria in many years.  I don't have
to install most any product when I do a drive copy.  Apparently
the registry entries work as authentication without a hardware
authentification process.
 
>> My uncle suffers this Monopolistic pain daily.
> 
> It's not monopolistic. It's just a license protection scheme. If you
> don't agree to the provisions of the license agreement, DON'T USE THE
> SOFTWARE. It's simple. :)
> 
>> He is STUPID enough to have repeatedly purchase upgraded
>> versions of an astrological software that Can't be moved from
>> computer to computer.
> 
> Since when does anybody move software from computer to computer on such
> a periodic basis as to make this intolerable?! Besides software pirates,
> I mean.

Let's assume he has computers with 3 legit copies.  Which he does.
Just so happens that all 3 copies are different versions.  For obvious reasons.
He buys a computer so he puts a new copy on it.  He puts the most recent
upgrade on the oldest copy he has.  Now, lets assume a system failure
once per year.  That leaves room for the HD or mobo or Windows to
take a dump.  That gives you 1 marked component failure per system
per 3 years.  That is if you consider Windows as a component.

With 3 computers, that is 3 failures a year.  You can call this as hypothetical
as you like.  I call it a royal pain.

>> Aggravation: Can't share it.  But then, he isn't suppose to.
> 
> Duh.
> 
>> Infuriating:  Can't replace or upgrade his computer.
> 
> I doubt this is true. A call to the software maker should get him
> reinstalled quickly and easily. That's how it works with us, at least.

Yes it does.  On any Thursday.  Heaven forbidden his computer to
crash on a Friday. He would have to wait and entire week for that
software to be running again.

> -=ck
> "Programming in a state of EUPHORIA."
> http://www.cklester.com/euphoria/

    unkmar

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu