Re: bloated 2.5

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ed Davis"
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 5:56 PM
Subject: RE: bloated 2.5


> 
> posted by: Ed Davis <ed_davis2 at yahoo.com>
> 
> Chris Bensler wrote:

[Snip]

>> That is a HACK solution. That type of attitude infests this
>> community, and it's WRONG. Firstly, just because it doesn't
>> affect you, doesn't mean it doesn't affect others. Second, the
>> mere fact that YOU have to manually do anything, and you don't
>> even have the option to stop eu from meddling with your own
>> setup, is a reflection of Euphoria's quality.
> 
> I agree, it should not mess with your setup, and I agree, you
> should not have to change anything.  And I agree that it should
> be fixed.  But I don't agree it is worth SHOUTING about.

Those actions PREVENTED me from EVER installing v2.4.
I assume you would ask, "How can it prevent?"
Answer: I knew ahead of time from the 2.3 install and from
others that it would cause me problems.  Therefore, I never
installed.  I didn't want to DEAL with the problems.
Not even ONCE.

And you don't think it is worth SHOUTING ABOUT?

>> This euphoria community is petty. It's not worth my effort to
>> try and help 'this mailing list'. My perspective is much larger
>> than this tiny, lazy community.
> 
> So why on earth do you hang around?  Why would you waste your
> time on a "petty", "tiny, lazy community", when you have
> something much larger in mind?

I'll answer that, even if he already has.  In hopes to educate and hope
to help Euphoria the language.  Not by helping the Euphoria community.
Doing the first will do the latter in time.

>> He ignores everyone, I don't feel special. he's been doing that
>> since the day I became familiar with Eu and the mailing list.
> 
> Really?  He seems to participate here pretty often.  Just because
> he doesn't choose to add the features you request, that doesn't
> mean he is ignoring you. It means he has a different opinion. It
> is his business to run his business the way he sees fit.  But I
> fail to see why you get so upset about out it - let me correct
> that - why you seem so upset about it.

Add features?
How about removing blunders?

> If I buy a product, and I don't like it, I return it (if I can).
> If I think it has potential, I might try to tell someone how they
> can improve it.  But so what if they don't do anything with my
> suggestions.  It is their product, and they are free to manage it
> as they see fit.  Why should I get all worked up about it?
> Life's too short for that.  Besides, there are other, real
> problems (you know, things like your children, spouse, job, etc)
> that always can use attention.  Euphoria not being perfect for me
> isn't a real problem in the grand scheme of things.

I don't mind it not being perfect.  But it would be nice if RC
hadn't apparently gone out of his way to make some things difficult.

>> Why do you think I have an 'overall tone' in the first place?
> 
> Because you do?  Ok, again it is my opinion.

He does !  Whether he wants to admit it or not.

     unkmar

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu