Re: Return from nested subroutines (still goto discussion)
On 12 Nov 2004, at 7:11, Jason Gade wrote:
>
>
> posted by: Jason Gade <jaygade at yahoo.com>
>
> Man, I thought that we were going to drop this.
>
> After Juergen's link regarding goto, I am not against having it. But Rob
> will never add it.
Some of the examples of goto given is what scares people, me included. I'd
not allow jumping in/out of a proc/function. I am not sure i'd allow jumping
into a loop of another sort, but i would allow jumping out of one (like exit or
break or continue or resume or repeat-until). Jumping into/out of procedures
breaks what goto is for.
> When 2.5 is released maybe someone will figure out how to implement it.
>
>
> On another note, when 2.5 is released will RDS be folding (some) submitted
> changes into the code base and change the Euphoria development model to
> 'release early and release often' or are we going to end up with several
> dozen one-off versions of Euphoria and a slew of programs that use features
> not
> included in the main distribution?
We'll have the one-off routines. Then it will compound, there'll be one-off
merges with other one-off versions, but with different code, and therefor
different quirks. Who uses Bach? Hellooo..... <echo>
Kat
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
