Re: Unregistered profile_time() (was: Re: copying global stuff to one file
Christian Cuvier wrote:
>
> >> > i want to release a cool library i made which profiles code. here's an
> >> > example output:
> >>
> >> Okay, are you planning to do this using the profile_time function
> >> within registered Euphoria?
> >
> > No.
> > I have already written this profile library. It simply measures how much
> > time was spent in a
> block of code and how many times it was run. Ofcourse I have to put two
> procedures around the block of code I want to profile,
> a little more work than using with profile, but there are some other
> advantages (besides i made me a macro in msdev which
> automatically puts this code in, so it's not much trouble):</font></i>
> >
>
> Does it work under Linux and al. as well?
It is generic. It uses time(). What's al.?
> - Under DOS32, you can trap int#70 and sort CMOS clocks ticks out.
> - Under WIN32, there's a couple of performance API functions that work just
> like time(), almost as easy. It's precise up to the microsecond, may not be
> functional on 486- machines.
> - Under Linux/BSD, I don't know.
time() is precise enough for me.
>
> I can't understand some earlier posts on this list about profile_time() not
> available in Win32, among which one from RC. I'm using my own start() and
> stop() precision stopwarch to profile_time() a possible next submission for
> the contest. And I didn't reverse engineer anything for that purpose, would
> take too much trouble, and am not using modified source of any kind.
I don't know about that, haven't tried profile_time for a long time, because it
is not available in unregistered version.
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
