Re: Scoring: 15(j) and incorrect submissions

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Andy Serpa wrote:
> 
> Pete Lomax wrote:
> > 
> > Should rule 15 (j) be changed to exclude incorrect submissions from
> > the speed bonus?
> > 
> > Or should I submit 10 bogus (but fast) programs so no-one effectively
> > gets any points for performance? blink)
> > 
> 
> In the final placing, I think all submissions by the same person should be
> considered an
> "entry" so that the same person can't win first & second place (for instance).
>  This
> would affect the ranking points given for speed as well -- maybe only a
> person's current
> best submission should count for points in the list to keep it from getting
> too confusing?

Both are good points. As for the first one, here is a proposed addendum
to the rules ...

---
Note: Any program that does not make a valid attempt to find and
accumulate token statistics, will be awarded a zero speed score. This is
to prevent spurious but fast programs being submitted. 
---
 
As for the second point, would  it sufficent to organise the rankings 
so that any given person can only have one ranking at anyone time? And 
that would be for their best effort so far.


I'll give this a day or two to get some feedback before I implement them.

-- 
Derek Parnell
Melbourne, Australia

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu