Re: The fate of Euphoria

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Andy Serpa wrote:
> 
> Derek Parnell wrote:
> > 
> > Greg Haberek wrote:
> > 
> > [snip]
> > 
> > > Stick that in your tailpipe and smoke it.
> > 
> > If Honda did upgrade the Civic, would you be upset? Are any of the
> > suggested upgrades going to cause you problems?
> > 
> > If, after having upgraded it, more people started buying them. Would that
> > upset you? Especially as that would improve spare parts prices and 
> > availability, and there'd be more knowledgable mechanics around.
> > 
> > If Honda started putting seat belts and airbags in as standard 
> > (hey! its an analogy), would that upset you?
> > 
> > Is it wrong to consider how things might be rather than how things are?
> > 
> > Is it wrong to think that Civic is not yet perfect? And thus to ask
> > for improvements?
> > 
> > Who is in the better position to improve the Civic? Honda or me? 
> > 
> > Some of us regard "status quo" as an opportunity for improvement rather
> > than a "life sentence".
> > 
> 
> All true, but the insinuation seems to be that because the Civic could be
> better, we
> shouldn't like the current Civic -- that the current Civic should make us
> angry.  The
> way I feel is that it could be better, but what it is now is good.  If it
> never changes
> again, it will still be good.  Good is good.
> 
The Google banner is serving ads for the Honda Civic -- I love it.

new topic     » goto parent     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu