RE: The fate of Euphoria
Chris Bensler wrote:
>
>
> > >At the very least, it seems to have
> > > stopped the various flame wars that were going on...
>
> > And people call me mad 
It also gives a break to RDS - I'm anxious
> > for v2.5 and Robert doesn't need to many problems just now.
>
> That is extremely dissapointing to hear.
> It's submissive attitudes like that, which allows RapidEuphoria to
> continue with their deceptive tactics of 'waiting out the storm'.
> That's dispicable, on both the part of Robert and on the part of people
> who I would normally consider better than that.
[big snip]
> Chris Bensler
> Code is Alchemy
Hi Chris,
It's great to know you have passion for helping improve Euphoria but I'm=
not sure posts like this help your cause.
Subtlety isn't your trump card is it! :)
I've been big on dishing out the dirt on Euphoria for many years ... but=
*I think* I have also started my posts with something like ...
"RDS own Euphoria and are 100% entitled to do whatever they want with it=
=85 " and this still stands true. RDS are under no financial or moral
obligation to do anything which they haven=92t specifically committed
themselves to. (The only thing I can think of is to provide free
support for X months after registration?)
I have written this so many times it must be becoming monotonous to
everyone (and me!) ...
=93If Euphoria can=92t do what you want it to do *now* =85 then Euphoria is=
n=92t=20
the correct tool for *you* because it ain=92t changing!=94
=93If Euphoria *is* doing what you want it to do now =85 great!=94
Everyone has a choice ... they can:
1. Use Euphoria, or
2. Not use Euphoria.
Myself, and what seems like alot of people in the past have decided on
option 2.
Regards,=20
Ray Smith
http://rays-web.com
|
Not Categorized, Please Help
|
|
