RE: Danger! Type-checking & the translator

new topic     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message 

ajm.tammer at quicknet.nl wrote:
> Hi Andy
> 
> You did not declare z to be local to the type(routine) so yhe code 
> inside the routine assigns a value ON YOUR COMMAND to the higherleveled 
> z ouside it

Forgive me for being slow, but wasn't that the intent?  It appeared to 
me that Andy was using Z as a flag to tell when the type was checked.

					Phil the Confused

> 
> :) a@t aka ekhnaton
> 
> BTW... what is the use of a type(routine) if you dont use it to check 
> validity of a user-defined type??
> 
>

new topic     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu