Re: Mangling of mails

new topic     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Hi Jim, you wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 12:39:51PM +0100, Juergen Luethje wrote:

<snipped by me>

>>> Hence my modifed signature, which has the '*' in it,

<snipped by me>

>>> and is also against
>>> "unneeded MIME" - MIME is good for file attachements, not so good for
>>> multipart
>>> emails. (Why someone wants to send both HTML and plain text version of an
>>> email
>>> is beyond me ...)
>>
>> Ahh.. Now I understand, what "unneeded MIME" means.  smile

Hmm ...

<snipped by me>

> However, I still remain against unneeded MIME. (i.e. some client, tho very
> rare, will attach RTF text to a message. Also, if someone attached the plain
> text body of an email TWICE, I would campain against that as well.)

... I think, *now* I understand, what "unneeded MIME" means. smile
Would you mind, if I use my ribbon together with your text?

> jbrown

Best regards,
   Juergen

-- 
 /"\  ASCII ribbon campain  |
 \ /  against HTML in       |  Superstition brings bad luck.
  X   e-mail and news       |
 / \  and unneeded MIME     |

new topic     » topic index » view thread      » older message » newer message

Search



Quick Links

User menu

Not signed in.

Misc Menu